Hi everyone, What a great day Saturday was! But, as per usual, I have come out of the conference with a question that I forgot to ask...
When the students are talking about the debate points for their case study, is it preferrable for them to use the views of different historians for different areas of debate? Or if a historian has written on a number of the areas of debate, can the students refer to the same historian for these different areas? Of course they will be looking at more than 2 or 3 perpectives but I wasn't sure to what extent they could use the same historians for the different areas of debate.
